The work by this group was of very good quality.
Their oral presentation demonstrated a similar quality, as corroborated by the numerous student group comments on their evaluation. A sampling of those comments include:
``good job of keeping audience attention; not boring.``
``...speak up just a little.``
``good photos and organization.``
``some reading from note cards, but not excessive; good opinions and facts; good knowledge of subject.``
``all spoke very clearly.``
``reading off of screen; not enough eye-contact.``
Their peer evaluations were of fair to good quality (ranged from 6 to 10), and incuded such observations as ``were well organized and worked well together,``always good about getting the info that was requested, ``had a hard time finding the information that was requested,`` ``seemed to have a half-hearted approach,`` ``well prepared``, ``great presentation.``
The strongest components of this site are that (1) the Intro page was very well done: I especially liked the greeting in multiple languages, the UN symbol and the UN flag animation -- the effort shows! (2) you did a very good job of incorporating images and photos along the site narraitive, to help readers see and read the report as they go; (3) sufficient care is given to the basics of spelling and grammer; (4) thorough research is evident as per the requirements of the assignment; (5) combining photos of key figures and quotes was a good idea.
Areas for improvement: (1) in a few instances (i.e, Possible Outcomes), more development of the thought line is needed. There is a lack of consistency present, where on other pages the narrative is well developed, these spots reveal a lack of depth.
Congrats to you all.
Dr. Fox
